Latest Articles

Effect of probiotics on growth of shrimps farming : A biochemical a...

Effect of probiotics on growth of shrimps farming : A biochemical a...

Prevalence and Intensity of urinary Schistosomiasis in school child...

Prevalence and Intensity of urinary Schistosomiasis in school child...

The Role of Computer Keyboards in spreading pathogenic Bacteria in ...

The Role of Computer Keyboards in spreading pathogenic Bacteria in ...

Bioremediation of heavy metal in paper mill effluent using Pseudomo...

Bioremediation of heavy metal in paper mill effluent using Pseudomo...

Serological and virological profile of dengue fever in a tertiary c...

Serological and virological profile of dengue fever in a tertiary c...

Friday, 26 Apr

Isolation and characterization of amino acid producing bacteria from cow dung

Abstract

Isolation and characterization of three distinct amino acid producing bacteria from the cow dung (CD) suspensions under aerobic condition have been studied. Based on their morphological and biochemical characteristics, the isolates of white colour bacteria (WCB), red colour bacteria (RCB) and yellow colour bacteria (YCB) were identified to be Gram-positive, rod-shaped and non-motile microbes belonging to E. coliBacillus sp.1 and Bacillus sp.2, respectively. The growth conditions of the bacterials isolated were then studied in the laboratory and the corresponding pH and temperature ranges were determined. Results on the antibiogram profiles of the bacterial isolates showed that 80-90% of the bacteria were sensitive against the antibiotics tested during the study. Amino acid producing capability of the bacteria was finally assessed in molasses-based fermentation media, and the amino acids isolated and identified from the three types of bacteria using paper chromatography were cysteine, serine and methionine. The relevance of the findings in relation to the commercial production of amino acids of medicinal, agricultural and nutritional significance has been discussed.

Key Words

Cow dung, amino acids, antibiogram profile, paper chromatography, E. coliBacillus spp.

Introduction

Amino acids are the most important source of energy which is crucial for the metabolic activities and thus play important role in various physiological processes in all living organisms. In addition, these are the building blocks of proteins, constitute a major part of the body, involved in building cells and repairing tissues, and form antibodies to combat foreign bodies like bacteria and viruses (Shakoori et al., 2012). Amino acids have a wide variety of applications in many different ways; they are used as animal feed additives (Campbell, 2001), some are flavour enhancers while others are used for therapeutic and psychotherapeutic purposes (Akashui et al.,1979; Kinoshita, 1987; Hermann, 2003).

 

Cow dung (CD) is bovine excreta that contain a mixture of dung and urine, generally in the ratio of 3:1. It contains crude fibre, crude protein, cellulose and various types of minerals such as N, K, S, and traces of P, Fe, Co, Mg, P, Cl and Mn (Nene, 1999). CD micro-flora usually contains abundant number of bacilli, lactobacilli and cocci and some identified and unidentified fungi and yeasts (Muhammad and Amusa, 2003) that can play an important role in producing enzymes, amino acids and other biomolecules.

Teo and Teoh (2011) identified five distinct morphologically and physiologically bacterial isolates from CD where all the isolates produced protease, lipase and esterase lipase. In a couple of recent studies, researchers have produced clear evidence that CD is an excellent source of biogas production owing to its methanogenic bacteria (Gopinath et al., 2014) and CD is capable of releasing major amino acids (Chomini et al., 2015).

 

In several recent studies, CD has been shown to be a cheap and available bio-resource that harbours a diverse group of microorganisms which may be beneficial to humans due to their ability to produce a range of metabolites. Thus cellulase producing bacteria (Bai et al., 2012; Hong-li et al., 2015), methanogenic bacteria (Pradhan and Gireesh Babu, 2012), indole acetic acid and ammonia producing bacteria (Radha and Rao, 2014) have been isolated and identified from CD. Moreover, bacterial isolates from CD having enzymatic activities (Sharma and Singh, 2015; Vijayaraghavan et al., 2016), and CD microbes capable of bio-fuel production and combating environmental pollutants (Gupta et al., 2016) have been reported, which imply that CD could be harnessed for medicinal, agricultural and industrial usages. Keeping the aforesaid findings in mind, the present investigation was aimed at isolating, characterizing and identifying amino acid producing bacteria from CD of exotic Jersey (Australian) cows at Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Materials and Methods

Collection of samples

The samples of the CD were collected from lactating Jersey cows of a dairy farm located at Gosh Para, Kazla, Rajshahi. Soon after collecting the CD sample in sterile polythene bags, they were transported to the Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Rajshahi University, for further processing and analyses.

 

Enrichment of culture for amino acid producing bacteria

The CD samples were suspended in individual 250 ml Erlenmeyer flaks each containing 100 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Control flasks without an inoculum were also maintained for comparisons. The primary enrichment was incubated for two days at 30°C with shaking at 120 rpm on an orbital shaker. The cultures that were found turbid after a period from 0 to 2 days were used as inocula in subsequent experiments.

Microscopic examinations and identification of bacterial cells

For the identification of the bacteria, morphological characters, microscopic observations, growth characteristics, biochemical tests and antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed. The microorganisms were identified using Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology(Holt et al., 2005).

Effects of temperature and pH on bacterial growth

Since both pH and temperature have been found to influence bacterial growth (Pradhan and Gireesh Babu, 2012; Radha and Rao, 2014), the present nutrient broth culture media (Hi-media, India) were adjusted to pH 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0, and the incubation temperatures were varied at 25ºC, 30ºC, 37ºC and 40ºC to study growth characteristics of the bacterial isolates. Bacterial cell density of the nutrient broth was determined by measuring optical density at 660 nm with a photoelectric colorimeter (AE-11M, Erma Inc., Tokyo) following the procedures described by Mohanta et al. (2012).

Screening of bacterial isolates for amino acid production

Media formulation:For the production of amino acids, molasses-based fermentation media (MF media) were tested for the isolation of amino acid fermenting bacteria obtained from the CD samples. The ingredients for the 100 ml media were: KH2PO4 (0.05g), K2HPO4(0.05g), MgSO4.7H2O (0.025g), (NH4)2SO4 (2.00g) and CaCO3 (2.00g). Agricultural industrial waste (10g.100 ml-1 cane molasses) was used in the media as carbon source. The pH of the media was kept within a range of 7.0-7.2. Sterilization was done through autoclaving the media at 121ºC at 15 lbs pressure for 15 min

Fermentation:A loopful of bacterial culture from a desired plate was inoculated into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ml of the fermentation medium. The flask was incubated at 30oC on a rotary shaker. The experiments for amino acid producing potential of these bacterial strains were carried out in a rotary shaker at 120 rpm for a maximum period of 96 hrs. During this period, 3 ml sample was monitored every 24 hrs. The harvest pH of each flask was also noted during the 96-hr incubation period.

Analysis and identification of the fermented amino acids

About 3 ml sample of fermented broth was centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10 min in order to collect the cell-free broth. Qualitative analyses of amino acids produced by bacteria in this fermented and cell-free broth were performed as detailed below

Qualitative analysis using paper chromatography

Lederer and Laderer (1957) method was followed for paper chromatography, where 0.03M standard solutions of six amino acids viz., methionine, serine, leucine, proline, cysteine and glycine were prepared. Solvent made of n-butanol: acetic acid: water (at 4: 1: 1) was added in a chromatographic rectangular glass jar. Standard amino acids and samples, 50 μl each, were loaded on to the Whatmann I chromatographic papers (Desaga Nr. 2045). The chromatographic tank papers were irrigated vertically in the solvent system for few hrs until the solvent traveled the distance on filter paper up to a certain point. Then the papers were air dried and sprayed with 0.1% ninhydrin solution (0.1g.100 ml-1 ethanol), and later dried at 60-80ºC for 10 min to get purple spots of the amino acids. The results were confirmed by comparing the retention factors (Rfvalues) of the samples with that of the standard amino acids. The Rf values were calculated by the following formula:

The distance was measured from the point where the amino acid was loaded to the point where solvent came to a halt.

Results

Isolation and identification of the bacteria

Bacteria were isolated by plating onto an agar solidified nutrient medium.

Among the three methods of inoculation,soil infestation and soil drenching were superior in showing root rot symptoms on inoculated plants.

The plates were incubated at 30°C for a day and bacterial colonies were found to grow on the medium. Results of microscopic analysis of bacterial cells and their colony morphological characteristics are presented in Tables 1 (a) and 1 (b) whereas the biochemical tests of the isolates are presented in Table 2. Preliminary characterization of the isolates according to their morphological and biochemical tests indicated that the bacterial strains belonged to E. coliBacillus sp. 1 and Bacillus sp. 2.

Antibiogram profile of the bacterial isolates

The antibiogram profile analyses of the three bacterial isolates revealed that 80-90% bacteria were sensitive whereas the remaining 10-20% bacteria were resistant against 10 antibiotics tested during the study (Table 3).

Effects of temperature and pH on bacterial growth

The growth of the bacterial isolates depended on pH and temperature. WCB and YCB showed optimum growth at pH 7 while the maximum growth of RCB was observed at pH 6 and the extreme pH (5.0 and 8.0) restricted for the growth of the bacteria (Figs.1, 2 and 3, respectively).

The optimum growth conditions of WCB and RCB, on the hand, were determined at 30ºC while YCB showed maximum growth at 25ºC (Figs. 4, 5 and 6, respectively).

It is apparent from the results that both the temperature and pH were important factors for the bacterial growth and so they will affect enzymatic reactions necessary for the production of amino acids from the CD suspensions.

Identification of amino acids

The maximum production of amino acids was obtained by the MF media used in the present experiment. The amino acids produced by the isolates in the media were identified by using paper chromatography followed by calculating their specific Rvalues. Results presented in Table 4 and Fig. 7 demonstrated that the bacterial strains WCB, RCB and YCB produced the amino acids cysteine, serine and methionine, respectively.



 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

In the present study three distinct amino acid producing bacteria were isolated from the CD suspensions at 30°C under aerobic condition. Based on their morphological and biochemical characteristics, the isolates WCB, RCB and YCB were identified to be Gram-positive, rod-shaped and non-motile bacteria belonging to E. coliBacillus sp.1 and Bacillus sp.2, respectively. The optimum growth conditions of the bacterials isolated were then studied in the laboratory and the corresponding pH and temperature ranges were determined.

Results on the antibiogram profiles of the bacterial isolates showed that maximum of the bacteria were sensitive against the antibiotics tested during the study. The amino acid producing capability of the bacteria was finally assessed in molasses-based fermentation media, and the amino acids isolated and identified from the three types of bacteria using paper chromatography were cysteine, serine and methionine.

Antibiotic sensitivity tests of the present study slightly differ from those of Teo and Teoh (2011) who used Kirby-Bauer assay to evaluate susceptibilities of five isolates to 17 different types of antibiotics, where each individual isolate was resistant to at least 35% of the antibiotics tested. In a recent study, eight antimicrobial drugs were used to treat the susceptibility patterns of isolated bacteria from CD; among four isolates two showed resistance to penicillin and rest of the strains were sensitive to all the antibiotics (Sharma and Singh, 2015). This is in good agreement with those of the present results.

Cysteine production by bacterial isolates in different fermentation media has been documented by Ali et al. (2011). Moreover, Gopinath et al. (2014) isolated different bacterial species from CD and reported that it contained high amount of methanogenic bacteria that increased its efficiency of biogas production. Recently, Chomini et al. (2015) demonstrated that four major amino acids viz., threonine, proline, glycine and alanine were released from digested CD. However, the present findings, corroborate to Shakoori et al. (2012) whereB. cereus was found to produce cysteine and glutamic acid, E. coli produced valine, and cysteine and methionine were produced by B. anthracis.

The right conditions for the growth of bacteria are present in a cow’s stomach. These bacteria are able to produce all the essential amino acids, even though its feed may not contain a full set of amino acids (Majda, 2014). For examples, Fungsin et al. (2008) isolated 240 strains of lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus salivarius, and Khan et al. (2011) diagnosed endospore producing Gram-positive cocci from samples of CD. Teo and Teoh (2011) isolated five morphologically and physiologically distinct isolates, two Gram-negative and three Gram-positive, from CD that produced enzymes such as protease, lipase and esterase lipase. Cellulase producing Bacillus subtilis (Bai et al., 2012) and methanogenic Bacillus sp. and Proteus sp. (Pradhan and Gireesh Babu, 2012)were identified using 16S rDNA sequencing and BLAST search. In addition, indole acetic acid and ammonia producing Bacillus spp. and Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus (Radha and Rao, 2014), cellulase producing Stenotrophomonas sp. and Bacillus cereus (Hong-li et al., 2015), and strains of Gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli (Sharma and Singh, 2015) were identified from CD. Recently, Gupta et al. (2016) and Vijayaraghavan et al. (2016) utilized CD microbes for bio-fuel production and management of environmental pollutants, and fibrinolytic enzyme production, respectively. So far the bacterial genera isolated from the CD are concerned; the present findings are in line with most of the work cited above, particularly Bai et al. (2012), Pradhan and Gireesh Babu (2012); Radha and Roa (2014); Hong-li et al. (2015) and Vijayaraghavan et al. (2016).

Amino acids are of great nutritional importance in food. In general, the world at present is confronted with the serious problems of food and nutrition deficiencies. Increased demand of proteins has led the researchers to search for unconventionally sources of proteins and amino acids (Majda, 2014; Vijayaraghavan et al., 2016). One of such sources is the microbes, particularly bacteria present in the CD which are capable of producing amino acids in profuse quantities (Fungsin et al., 2008; Radha and Rao, 2014; Chomini et al., 2015). The results of the present study are quite encouraging in that the fermented bacterial suspensions of the CD could be utilized on commercial scale in the country, with special reference to their agricultural, medicinal and nutritional significance.

Conclusion

In summary, we conclude that the microbial fermentation process can be used for the production of amino acids at very economical rates by using locally isolated strains from natural sources. The natural source including CD (cowdung) which is rich in micro-flora can provide bacterial strains for production of amino acids by fermentation on commercial scale to meet the local demand in the country.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Chairperson, Department of Zoology, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, for providing laboratory facilities, and to laboratory Attendants, for their technical assistance. This research did not enjoy any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Akashui K, Shibai H, Hirose Y (1979). Effect of oxygen supply on L-lysine, L-threonine and L-isoleucine fermentations. Agric. Biol. Chem. 43: 2087–2092.
  2. Ali NM, Shakoori FR, Shakoori AR (2011). Improvement in cysteine production by local bacterial isolates. Pakistan J. Zool. 43: 805-808.
  3. Bai S, Kumar MR, Kumar DJM, Balashanmugam P, Kumaran MDB, Kalaichelvan PT (2012). Cellulase production by Bacillus subtilis isolated from cow dung. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 4(1): 269-279.
  4. Campbell KCM (2001).Therapeutic use of D-methionine to reduce the toxicity of platinum-containing anti-tumor compounds and other compounds, US Patent 6187817.
  5. Fungsin B, Wannissorn B, Chatanon L, Aphinan Srichuai A, Artjariyasripong S (2008). Screening of lactic acid bacteria isolated from cow dung for probiotic properties. 8thInt. Symp. Biocontrol Biotechnol. Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 177-183.
  6. Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D (2016). Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 3: 28DOI 10.1186/s40643-016-0105-9.
  7. Hassan B, Asghar M, Nadeem S, Zubair H, Muzammil HM, Shahid M (2003). Isolation and screening of amino acids producing bacteria from milk. J. Biotechnol. 2(1): 18-29.
  8. Hermann T (2003). Industrial production of amino acids by coryneform bacteria, J. Biotechnol. 104: 155-172.
  9. Holt JG, Krirg NR, Sneath PH, Standley JT, Williams ST (2005). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (9th edn). Baltimore, USA.
  10. Hong-li Z, Xiao Y, Dong-mei X, Lu Z, Kai-zhong T, Xing-yao X, Yun L, Xiao-jun S (2015). Isolation, identification and characterization of cellulose-degradation bacteria from fresh cow dung and fermentation biogas slurry. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29(3): 131-143.
  11. Khan JA, Ranjan RK, Rathod V, Gautam P (2011). Deciphering cow dung for cellulase producing bacteria. European J. Exp. Biol. 1(1): 139-147.
  12. Kinoshita S (1987). Thirty years of amino acid fermentation. Proc. 4th Eur. CongsBiotechnol. 4: 679-687.
  13. Lederer E, Lederer M (1957). Chromatography (2nd edn). Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
  14. Majda, W (2014). Can a cow produce 100 pounds of pig feed a day? http://permaculturenews.org/2014/08/22/can-cow-produce-100-pounds-pig-feed-day.
  15. Mohanta MK, Saha AK, Zamman MT, Ekram AE, Khan AS, Mannan SB, Fakruddin, M (2012). Isolation and characterization of carbofuran degrading bacteria from cultivated soil. Biochem. Cell. Arch. 12(2): 313-320.
  16. Muhammad S, Amusa NA (2003). In vitro inhibition of growth of some seeding blight inducing pathogens by compost inhibiting microbes. Afr. J. Biotechnol.2(6): 161-164.
  17. Nene YL (1999). Seed health in ancient and medieval history and its relevance to present day agriculture. Asian Agri-Hist.3: 157-84.
  18. Pradhan P, Gireesh Babu K (2012). Isolation and identification of methanogenic bacteria from cow dung. Int. J. Curr. Res. 4(7): 28-31.
  19. Radha TK, Rao DLN (2014). Plant growth promoting bacteria from cow dung based biodynamic preparations. Indian J. Microbiol. 54(4): 413-418. doi 10.1007/s12088-014-0468-6.
  20. Shakoori FR, Butt AM, Ali NM, Zahid MT, Rehman A, Shakoori AR (2012). Optimization of fermentation media for enhanced amino acids production by bacteria isolated from natural sources. Pakistan J. Zool. 44(4): 1145-1157.
  21. Sharma B, Singh M (2015). Isolation and characterization of bacteria from cow dung of desi cow breed on different morpho-biochemical parameters in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biol. Chem. 4(2): 276-281.
  22. Teo KC, Teoh, SM (2011). Preliminary biological screening of microbes isolated from cow dung in Kampar. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(9): 1640-1645. Doi: 10.5897/AJB10.1589.
  23. Vijayaraghavan P, Arun A, Vincent SGP, Arasu MV, Al-Dhabi NA (2016). Cow dung is a novel feedstock for fibrinolytic enzyme production from newly isolated Bacillus sp. IND7 and its application in in vitro clot lysis. Front. Microbiol. 7: 361. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00361.
  24. Gopinath LR, Christy PM, Mahesh K, Bhuvaneswari R, Divya D (2014). Identification and evaluation of effective bacterial consortia for efficient biogas production. J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 8(3): 80-86.
  25. Chomini MS, Ogbonna CIC, Falemara BC, Micah P (2015). Effect of co-digestion of cow dung and poultry manure on biogas yield, proximate and amino acid contents of their effluents. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 8(11): 48-56.

How to cite this article

MFHAKS Moni Krishno Mohanta*, Mst. Sabia Aktar Mohua, M. Saiful Islam (2017) Isolation and characterization of amino acid producing bacteria from cow dung, Microbioz Journals, Journal of Microbiology and Biomedical Research 3 (2)

Post Your Comment

Subscribe @Microbioz Journals

    Subscribe to our newsletter